Archives

  • 2018-07
  • 2018-10
  • 2018-11
  • 2019-04
  • 2019-05
  • 2019-06
  • 2019-07
  • 2019-08
  • 2019-09
  • 2019-10
  • 2019-11
  • 2019-12
  • 2020-01
  • 2020-02
  • 2020-03
  • 2020-04
  • 2020-05
  • 2020-06
  • 2020-07
  • 2020-08
  • 2020-09
  • 2020-10
  • 2020-11
  • 2020-12
  • 2021-01
  • 2021-02
  • 2021-03
  • 2021-04
  • 2021-05
  • 2021-06
  • 2021-07
  • 2021-08
  • 2021-09
  • 2021-10
  • 2021-11
  • 2021-12
  • 2022-01
  • 2022-02
  • 2022-03
  • 2022-04
  • 2022-05
  • 2022-06
  • 2022-07
  • 2022-08
  • 2022-09
  • 2022-10
  • 2022-11
  • 2022-12
  • 2023-01
  • 2023-02
  • 2023-03
  • 2023-04
  • 2023-05
  • 2023-06
  • 2023-07
  • 2023-08
  • 2023-09
  • 2023-10
  • 2023-11
  • 2023-12
  • 2024-01
  • 2024-02
  • 2024-03
  • 2024-04
  • 2024-05
  • Previous studies found that depression primarily results fro

    2021-07-17

    Previous studies found that depression primarily results from impaired monoaminergic neurotransmission systems [1], [2]. The glutamatergic and GABAergic systems as well as several neuropeptide systems have also been the focus of pathophysiological studies on depression [1], [2]. Inflammatory cytokines and molecular intermediates are also suggested to be involved in depression, presumably by regulating neurotransmitter metabolism, neuroendocrine function, and synaptic function [4]. Among these molecules, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), a rate-limiting enzyme for prostaglandin (PG) production, is suggested to play an important role in depression because COX-2 mRNA is increased in the peripheral blood cells of patients with depression [5]. Consistent with this, a specific COX-2 inhibitor, celecoxib, has a therapeutic effect on depression (for a review, see [6]). COX-2 was also demonstrated to be involved in animal depression models. In the forced-swim test (FST), a behavioral despair paradigm, chronic treatment with selective and non-selective COX-2 inhibitors shows antidepressant-like effect [7]. In a chronic unpredictable stress model, treatment with celecoxib blocks decreased sucrose preference, an indicator of a key symptom of depression [8]. The five primary PGs (PGD2, PGE2, PGF2α, PGI2, and thromboxane A2) are synthesized from arachidonic Cy5 TSA Fluorescence System Kit via sequential actions of COX subtypes and their respective synthases; these PGs exert their actions through their cognate G-protein-coupled receptors, including the chemoattractant receptor-homologous molecule expressed on T helper type 2 cells (CRTH2) [9]. PGE2 signaling mediated through the E prostanoid receptor 1 (EP1) receptor is critical for susceptibility to repeated stress, a risk factor for depression [10]. Considering the major effect observed for COX-2 inhibitors in depression, the other PGs and their receptors are likely to be involved. However, the precise role of each PG and its receptor is largely Cy5 TSA Fluorescence System Kit unknown. CRTH2 and the D prostanoid receptor (DP1) function as receptors for PGD2[11]. In the central nervous system, DP1 but not CRTH2 is involved in PGE2-induced allodynia, the sleep–wake cycle, glutamate-induced neuronal toxicity, and food intake [12], [13], [14], [15], suggesting that DP1 and CRTH2 have distinct functions in the central nervous system. Recently, we found that central CRTH2 but not DP1 regulates emotional aspects of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)- and tumor-induced sickness behaviors [16]. Given that LPS-induced sickness behavior critically involves the COX-2-PG pathway [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], PGD2-CRTH2 is likely to modulate sickness behavior by regulating COX-2-mediated signaling in the brain [16]. Furthermore, several lines of evidence suggest that sickness behavior and depression share many of the same symptoms and common inflammatory pathways [22]. These findings led us to further investigate the possible involvement of central PGD2-CRTH2 in motivational impairments such as depression and sickness behavior.
    Materials and methods
    Results
    Discussion Previous studies have found that the COX-dependent production of PG in the brain plays an important role in various animal models of depression [7], [8]; however, it is largely unknown which PG subtypes mediate the behavioral changes in these models. Using well-established depression-related models, we here demonstrated that both the genetic and acute pharmacological inhibition of CRTH2 abolished an increase in depression-related behaviors, such as decreased social interaction in the SIT and increased immobility in the FST. We also found that the mRNA expression of COX-2 and L-PGDS, both of which regulate PGD2 production, were increased by CORT treatment. Taken together, these results suggest that CRTH2-mediated signaling in the brain is likely a molecular player that mediates depression-related behaviors. Clinical studies revealed that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, which inhibit COX activity, have therapeutic effects in major depression [42], [43]. These studies suggested that PGs are involved in depression; however, the precise mechanisms underlying COX-mediated depression remain unclear. Our current studies strongly argue that central CRTH2-mediated signaling plays an important role in depression. Recently, Narumiya's group found that PGE2 together with its receptor EP1 are relevant in repeated social defeat stress, a mouse model of depression [10]. Furthermore, other PGE2 receptors, including EP2, EP3, and EP4, are likely to be involved in depression-related behavior (for a review, see [44]). In contrast to these receptors, DP1, another PGD2 receptor, is unlikely to be involved in depression [16]. Future studies using genetic and pharmacological interventions of PG-mediated pathways are needed to elucidate the precise functions of these pathways in depression. Specifically, it will be interesting to learn whether PGD2−CRTH2 and PGE2−EP1 pathways cooperatively or independently regulate depression.